If you don’t choose your movies based on what the guy at the box office recommends, why would you choose your books that way?
Farhad Manjoo, Don’t Support Your Local Bookseller, Slate, Dec. 13, 2011
By James Grimmelmann
Professor of Law
New York Law School
Information
Subscribe
Archives
2011
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2010
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2009
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2008
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2007
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2006
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2005
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2004
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2003
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2002
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2001
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2000
Jan
Mar
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
1997
Sep
1995
Nov
1993
Oct
1992
Oct
Powered by Movable Type
The Worst Sentence I Have Read Today
If you don’t choose your movies based on what the guy at the box office recommends, why would you choose your books that way?
Farhad Manjoo, Don’t Support Your Local Bookseller, Slate, Dec. 13, 2011
This isn’t about the the rest of Manjoo’s essay, or about Russo’s essay. It’s about a rhetorical question with such an obvious comeback that it’s embarrassing. I couldn’t tell you how many books I’ve bought and loved based on a recommendation (in person or via stocking and shelving choices) by an independent bookstore clerk. But it’s a lot.
And here (before reading the comments) I assumed your objection was based on the memory of renting movies based on what the guy at the video store said. I think they have a higher batting average than bookstore clerks, though maybe I’m biased by having lived near some incredibly excellent video stores (both of which are now closed, sadly.)
Manjoo isn’t talking about video stores; video stores don’t have “box offices.” He’s making an inaccurate comparison to movie-theater employees — a non sequitur on so many levels that I don’t know where to start.
Then, too, his assertion that Amazon is “better for” authors indicates that he’s never seen a publishing contract and compared it to a royalty statement. Particularly for any contract signed before 2005 (and that can include multibook contracts with books not yet published), Amazon’s demands for discounts frequently push sales to Amazon into the “high discount” category, in which the author earns only half as much for each copy sold (or less). That’s not better for authors…
Appearances
June 7-8: Privacy Law Scholars, George Washington
May 23: We Are All Anonymous, Triple Canopy
May 16: Second Annual Conference on Competition, Search, and Social Media, George Mason
May 4: Anonymity and Identity in the Information Age, Cardozo Law School
April 21: Innovate/Activate, U.C. Berkeley
Media
May 18: Quoted in Bright Lines, Big Uncertainty at Publishers Weekly
May 17: Quoted in Georgia State Copyright Case: What You Need To Know—and What It Means for E-Reserves at LibraryJournal
May 15: Quoted in E-Reservations at Inside Higher Ed
May 14: Quoted in Schools can give students 10 percent of a book or one whole chapter at paidContent
May 14: Quoted in Judge Delivers Mixed Verdict in GSU E-reserves Case at Publishers Weekly
Papers
Death of a Data Haven, Ars Technica
Sealand, HavenCo, and the Rule of Law, Illinois Law Review
The Orphan Wars, Educause Review
Undiplomatic Immunity, Jotwell
Owning the Stack, Ars Technica