If you don’t choose your movies based on what the guy at the box office recommends, why would you choose your books that way?
Farhad Manjoo, Don’t Support Your Local Bookseller, Slate, Dec. 13, 2011
Archives
2014
Jan
Feb
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Dec
2013
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Nov
Dec
2012
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2011
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2010
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2009
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2008
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2007
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2006
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2005
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2004
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2003
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2002
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2001
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2000
Jan
Mar
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
1997
Sep
1995
Nov
1993
Oct
1992
Oct
Powered by Movable Type
The Worst Sentence I Have Read Today
If you don’t choose your movies based on what the guy at the box office recommends, why would you choose your books that way?
Farhad Manjoo, Don’t Support Your Local Bookseller, Slate, Dec. 13, 2011
This isn’t about the the rest of Manjoo’s essay, or about Russo’s essay. It’s about a rhetorical question with such an obvious comeback that it’s embarrassing. I couldn’t tell you how many books I’ve bought and loved based on a recommendation (in person or via stocking and shelving choices) by an independent bookstore clerk. But it’s a lot.
And here (before reading the comments) I assumed your objection was based on the memory of renting movies based on what the guy at the video store said. I think they have a higher batting average than bookstore clerks, though maybe I’m biased by having lived near some incredibly excellent video stores (both of which are now closed, sadly.)
Manjoo isn’t talking about video stores; video stores don’t have “box offices.” He’s making an inaccurate comparison to movie-theater employees — a non sequitur on so many levels that I don’t know where to start.
Then, too, his assertion that Amazon is “better for” authors indicates that he’s never seen a publishing contract and compared it to a royalty statement. Particularly for any contract signed before 2005 (and that can include multibook contracts with books not yet published), Amazon’s demands for discounts frequently push sales to Amazon into the “high discount” category, in which the author earns only half as much for each copy sold (or less). That’s not better for authors…
Appearances
October 6: American University Colloquium on Scholarly Communication
Media
December 3: The Nuances of Threats on Facebook (New Yorker)
December 2: A record label says a Cox customer shared illegal files 54,489 times. Is Cox liable? (Vox)
Nov. 24: In Social-Media Era, When Is Free Speech Illegal? (Wall Street Journal)
October 24: Reversal of Fortunes: What a Recent Appeals Court Ruling Holds for Academic Fair Use (Publishers Weekly)
September 25: Facebook, OkCupid research raises new ethical questions in use of ‘big data’ (Baltimore Sun)
Papers
Three letters about the Facebook emotional manipulation study
Brief of 36 Intellectual Property and Copyright Law Professors as Amicus Curiae, ABC v. Aereo (Supreme Court)
The Cancer of the Internet, Jotwell
What to Do About Google?, Comm. of the ACM, Sept. 2013, at 28
Internet Law: Cases and Problems (3rd ed. 2013)