<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
  <title>The Laboratorium | Recent Comments </title>
  <link rel="self" href="http://laboratorium.net/comments.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/" />
  <updated>2008-05-07T12:36:07Z</updated>
  <subtitle>The most recent comments to the Laboratorium</subtitle>
  <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2</id>
  <generator uri="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="4.01">Movable Type</generator>
  <rights>Copyright (c) 2008, James Grimmelmann</rights>

  <entry>
    <title>Possible Sequels</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/05/04/possible_sequels#comment-6277" />
    <updated>2008-05-07T12:36:07Z</updated>
    <published>2008-05-07T08:36:07-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.6277</id>
    <author>
      <name>Sarah L.</name>
      
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      Petit Larceny Auto (it involves only really, really crappy cars).
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Possible Sequels</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/05/04/possible_sequels#comment-6253" />
    <updated>2008-05-07T01:13:38Z</updated>
    <published>2008-05-06T21:13:38-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.6253</id>
    <author>
      <name>Josh</name>
      
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      -Grand Theft Otto Preminger

<p>-Grand Theft Blotto</p>

<p>-Grand Theft Ocho</p>

<p>Prequels: </p>

<p>-Grand Theft Taco</p>

<p>-Grand Theft Soap Box Derby</p>

<p>-Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle in the Second Degree</p>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Possible Sequels</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/05/04/possible_sequels#comment-6215" />
    <updated>2008-05-05T22:12:58Z</updated>
    <published>2008-05-05T18:12:58-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.6215</id>
    <author>
      <name>Henry Lowengard</name>
      
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      Grand theft Autoharp? You just said the magic word!
<a href="http://www.echo.net/~jhhl/aharp.html" rel="nofollow">You just said the magic word!</a>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Possible Sequels</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/05/04/possible_sequels#comment-6191" />
    <updated>2008-05-05T05:22:39Z</updated>
    <published>2008-05-05T01:22:39-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.6191</id>
    <author>
      <name>Brian</name>
      
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      I vote for Grand Theft Otter, regardless of whether votes are being accepted.  If a drunken otter is going to be shooting at virtual cops I want to be that otter.
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Call for Freedom and Privacy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/05/02/call_for_freedom_and_privacy#comment-6169" />
    <updated>2008-05-04T15:54:39Z</updated>
    <published>2008-05-04T11:54:39-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.6169</id>
    <author>
      <name>Kat</name>
      
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      I was somehow pulled in to a CFP panel in 2006. And you think <em>you&#8217;re</em> not worthy&#8230; 

<p>(The highlight for me was that Vernor Vinge came to it, in the time slot right before his keynote, and I got to chat with him and a small group of really cool people for about an hour after his talk.)</p>

<p>That was my first time speaking at a conference, and I&#8217;m afraid it may all be downhill from there.</p>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Yoo&apos;s Town</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/04/20/yoos_town#comment-5735" />
    <updated>2008-04-21T11:19:58Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-21T07:19:58-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5735</id>
    <author>
      <name>Tim</name>
      
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      Hmm. Would that Jackson, J., had said a little bit more about that whole &#8220;lowest ebb&#8221; bit. The size of that lowest reserve of authority is really the central question&#8212; although it may be a &#8220;political question,&#8221; at that.

<p>Re: the last line, do you really think that authoring an imperfect OLC opinion &#8212; even if it rose to the level of malpractice, which I think is not clear &#8212; really amounts to a war crime? Does that mean that all the other lawyers who have participated in providing legal justifications for certain war on terror tactics, or the lawyers defending those who carried out such tactics, are also war criminals?</p>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>New York Law Schools?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/04/14/new_york_law_schools#comment-5688" />
    <updated>2008-04-19T20:03:24Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-19T16:03:24-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5688</id>
    <author>
      <name>WL</name>
      
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      There&#8217;s long been a perception that law schools are cash cows for their parent university: over time a law library probably costs less to maintain than a science lab, plus students are locked in to at least 3 years of tuition as opposed to 2 years at biz schools, and lawyers as a profession earn more than many other professionals thus allowing them to donate more as alumni. I think it&#8217;s this perception that&#8217;s partially responsible for driving the glut of new law schools over the last decade.

<p>Whatever happened to the plan for Stony Brook to buy Touro Law instead of building a law school from scratch?</p>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>New York Law Schools?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/04/14/new_york_law_schools#comment-5548" />
    <updated>2008-04-15T01:27:17Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-14T21:27:17-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5548</id>
    <author>
      <name>James Grimmelmann</name>
      <uri>http://laboratorium.net/</uri>
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      As with many other forms of education, the arguments for public funding of legal education shouldn&#8217;t be ignored.  There&#8217;s always the standard public-good argument, though here it probably depends on your feelings about lawyers.

<p>One important line is that law firms aren&#8217;t the only consumers of lawyers; governments and public-interest groups also need legal work.  Graduating lawyers who aren&#8217;t crippled with debt is one way to provide lawyers to do society&#8217;s work.  Another goal is to direct the content of legal education so that it contains stronger emphasis on public service and less emphasis on self-interest (not that many states do this, but one does see arguments that state-funded law schools ought to).  </p>

<p>The flow of lawyers among states is another reason that some states fund law schools. The smallest states might not have critical mass to support a law school without funding; some states might lose too many graduates to other states unless they produced a local oversupply.  This last reason seems particularly inappropriate for New York, which has a constant inward stream of out-of-state law school graduates sitting for the New York bar.</p>

<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m just pointing out that there are reasons why many reasonable people don&#8217;t want the let the market sort things out by itself when it comes to funding law schools.  It&#8217;s hard to see those reasons adding up to three new law schools in New York, though.</p>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>New York Law Schools?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/04/14/new_york_law_schools#comment-5547" />
    <updated>2008-04-15T01:19:03Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-14T21:19:03-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5547</id>
    <author>
      <name>Steve Laniel</name>
      <uri>http://laniels.org/</uri>
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      I&#8217;m the sort of guy who gets upset when others misuse the subjunctive, so let&#8217;s all just pretend that final phrase reads &#8220;if it wasn&#8217;t obvious.&#8221;
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>New York Law Schools?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/04/14/new_york_law_schools#comment-5545" />
    <updated>2008-04-15T01:16:31Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-14T21:16:31-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5545</id>
    <author>
      <name>Steve Laniel</name>
      <uri>http://laniels.org/</uri>
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      You&#8217;d think the free market would be more likely to know the proper number of law schools than would the state government. Either law firms should pay to create new law schools, or wealthy lawyers should fund new schools, or somesuch. Seems to me that we want there to be a proper feedback between demand for lawyers and supply for lawyers: when the former goes down, so should the latter. I can&#8217;t imagine the supply and demand will be kept in check if state governments are deciding this sort of thing.

<p>Maybe this will just be an initial disequilibrium. If no one wants to attend Binghamton&#8217;s law school, they probably won&#8217;t be able to afford the faculty, so the proper equilibrium will be restored in time.</p>

<p>This is all by way of arrant speculation, if it weren&#8217;t obvious.</p>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Rescuecom Oral Argument Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/04/04/rescuecom_oral_argument_report#comment-5422" />
    <updated>2008-04-10T17:17:58Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-10T13:17:58-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5422</id>
    <author>
      <name>Daniel Jurin</name>
      <uri>http://styrotrim.com</uri>
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      I own the trademark StyroTrim. I purchased the trademark to Identify my product line not someone elses. Google sells it to my competitors for a profit. I paid the lawyers, I paid the USPTO, I pay to Advertise my brand on national tv. I did not give google permission to sell my rightfully purchased identity to any one for any price. They dont send me my cut of the adsales money of my name. Not to mention all the impressions that are provided my competitor because google sells them my name. I feel this is the core of the problem. GOOGLE has no right to profit from my name. They never asked and I never said they could.

<p>Daniel Jurin</p>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Rescuecom Oral Argument Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/04/04/rescuecom_oral_argument_report#comment-5414" />
    <updated>2008-04-10T13:48:53Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-10T09:48:53-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5414</id>
    <author>
      <name>Ajay</name>
      <uri>http://www.swamiseo.co.uk</uri>
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      It is complex issue might not be resolved so easily.

<p>But one thing is for sure. Since PPC are keywords based it is very easy for Editors to pickit out and decline those keywords which I&#8217;ve seen MS Adcenter is doing.</p>

<p>Seems to be so easy why so much noise on it?</p>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Rescuecom Oral Argument Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/04/04/rescuecom_oral_argument_report#comment-5339" />
    <updated>2008-04-06T10:37:49Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-06T06:37:49-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5339</id>
    <author>
      <name>Richard Bartle</name>
      <uri>http://www.mud.co.uk/richard</uri>
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      Does this case have extensions beyond trademark law? There used to be sponsored links to gold sellers appear when I typed my name in to Google. How would the judges feel if their names were being used as keys to sponsor porn sites, say?

<p>Also, what about the fact that Google sponsored links don&#8217;t make a distinction between whether the user wants or doesn&#8217;t want the keyword? If I type INCLUSIVE PACKAGE HOLIDAY into google.co.uk (a &#8220;package holiday&#8221; is what we call a vacation package in the UK) then I get a list of matches and associated sponsored links. If, however, I type INCLUSIVE PACKAGE -HOLIDAY then sure enough, the matches no longer contain the word &#8220;holiday&#8221; but the sponsored links do still contain it. I explicitly ask NOT to have an links with the word &#8220;holiday&#8221; in them, and yet I get things like this:</p>

<p>All inclusive holidays
All inclusive beach holidays
Book all inclusive holidays cheap
www.allinclusivebeach.com</p>

<p>If a Rescuecom wanted to link to a Google search from their own site, and wished to avoid &#8220;confusing&#8221; customers by bringing up references to other companies providing a similar service, they would want to use a search term such as RESCUECOM -ABC -DEF -GHI (or whatever their competitors are called). However, although this would indeed remove ABC, DEF and GHI from the search results, it would probably increase the likelihood that their ads would be displayed, not decrease it.</p>

<p>Richard</p>
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>The Revolution Will Not Be Archived (If the Section 108 Study Group Has Its Way)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/03/31/the_revolution_will_not_be_archived_if_the_section#comment-5331" />
    <updated>2008-04-05T19:55:37Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-05T15:55:37-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5331</id>
    <author>
      <name>Samir Chopra</name>
      <uri>http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~bcfoss/DL</uri>
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      James, if you get a chance, check out the mini-discussion thats happened at my blog. I think there is some confusion on display. 
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>The Revolution Will Not Be Archived (If the Section 108 Study Group Has Its Way)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/03/31/the_revolution_will_not_be_archived_if_the_section#comment-5296" />
    <updated>2008-04-04T19:33:48Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-04T15:33:48-05:00</published>
    <id>tag:laboratorium.net,2008://2.5296</id>
    <author>
      <name>Samir Chopra</name>
      <uri>http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~bcfoss/DL</uri>
    </author>

    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://laboratorium.net/">
      Good stuff James. <a href="http://decodingliberation.blogspot.com/2008/04/section-1082357-gerritt.html" rel="nofollow">Just blogged on this post (more like a quick link really)</a>.  
]]>
   
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>