The Official Laboratorium Jellyfish

The Laboratorium has been brought to you since 2000 by James Grimmelmann. Here's some information about the site and here's my disclosure statement.

Recent Comments

Douglas Fevens, on GBS: Internet Archive Starts Lending In-Copyright E-Books, “It is funny that the Boston Public Library never announced this service…”

Jerome Garchik, on GBS: Brantley on the Settlement and E-Book Rights, “A report in Publishers Weekly states that the Wylie- Random House/Bertlesman deal…”

Frances Grimble, on GBS: Brantley on the Settlement and E-Book Rights, ““but what really matters are the actual numbers and economic choices and…”

Jerome M. Garchik, on GBS: Brantley on the Settlement and E-Book Rights, “It would be helpful if Peter Brantly or someone else would cite…”

Frances Grimble, on GBS: Brantley on the Settlement and E-Book Rights, “Edward Hasbrouk and others have been arguing (I think correctly) that a…”

Douglas Fevens, on GBS: An Open Letter on the Open Internet, “James Grimmelmann: “Even if Google today goes ahead with these [settlement] terms,…”

john walker, on Wrong Again, Zuck, “or perhaps read this ? Belfiore, Eleonora(2009) ‘On bullshit in cultural policy…”

john walker, on Wrong Again, Zuck, “I suggest that they should read the Book of Job.…”

Frances Grimble, on Wrong Again, Zuck, “John, US money is still printed and stamped with the slogan “In…”

john walker, on Wrong Again, Zuck, “Is there that much of a qualitative difference between the trust of…”

Archives

2010
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug 
2009
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
2008
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
2007
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
2006
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
2005
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
2004
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
2003
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
2002
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
2001
Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
2000
Jan  Mar  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec 
1999
Jan  Feb  Mar  Sep 
1998
Jan  May  Jun  Sep  Nov 
1997
Sep 
1995
Nov 
1993
Oct 
1992
Oct 


Old Sideblog Archive


Pondering Potter Archive

Courtesy of our nation’s great judicial system (and by way of Daniel Solove) comes news confirming something I have long suspected: bar review courses feed their students wrong answers. The folks behind PMBR (the three- or six-day cram course that sells itself as a multistate supplement to the much more extensive months-long Bar/Bri review) just lost a copyright suit brought by the National Conference of Bar Examiners. After a four-day bench trial, the federal District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Fullam, Sr. J.) held that PMBR’s questions—many of which were direct knockoffs of MBE questions—infringed the NCBE’s copyrights.

That’s the legal case, at least. But the opinion also contains some sly digs at the quality of PMBR’s services. My favorite:

This question tests the same legal concept using the same fictitious statute and four virtually identical answer choices in the same order. As with a number of PMBE questions, the answer key here is incorrect, further undermining Mr. Feinberg’s claims that he derived his questions independently from authoritative legal sources.

That’s right: PMBR copied the question but got the answer wrong. And these are the people that thousands of law students are paying handsomely to guide them through the shoals of the bar exam. When I was studying for it last year, I would occasionally come across a question in one of my sample question books whose answer I simply disagreed with, even after careful reflection.

Now, I think I have a better idea why.

Post a comment



You can use HTML style tags or Markdown.

Comment Preview: